While “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” showcases plenty of ape action, it falls short in terms of character development and an engaging screenplay. In this film, the world is predominantly ape-dominated, presenting a narrative that lacks innovation and fails to captivate audiences.
This latest installment follows the successful franchise reboot initiated in 2011 with “Rise of the Planet of the Apes,” featuring Caesar, the intelligent and peaceful leader of the apes portrayed by Andy Serkis. However, under the direction of Wes Ball, known for the Maze Runner trilogy, the film takes a leap in time with new characters, signaling a departure from the previous trilogy. While the motion-capture technology remains impressive, the storyline fails to introduce anything fresh or compelling.
Set generations after Caesar’s reign, the film introduces Noa, portrayed by Owen Teague, a young ape unaware of Caesar’s legacy. Despite benefiting from Caesar’s influence, Noa’s coming-of-age journey lacks the depth and impact of Caesar’s narrative. The village setting, although visually appealing, fails to deliver meaningful character development or an engaging plot.
The action sequences are visually striking, particularly the attack on Noa’s village, orchestrated with precision to evoke a sense of horror and urgency. However, beyond the spectacle of ape warfare, the film struggles to offer substance. Noa’s journey, while courageous, feels predictable and formulaic, lacking the complexity and depth seen in previous installments.
The screenplay’s attempts to address themes of authoritarianism and coexistence between apes and humans fall flat due to its simplistic and uninspired execution. Despite glimpses of potential conflict and intrigue, particularly with the introduction of Mae and William H Macy’s character, the narrative fails to explore these themes in a meaningful way.
Ultimately, “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” feels derivative and uninspired, relying on familiar tropes and recycled plot elements. While the film hints at future conflicts, it fails to deliver a compelling narrative in its own right, leaving audiences underwhelmed and craving more.
